Mother Theresa To Live By Heart

Mother Theresa: To Live By Heart When we talk about great and powerful people of the 20th century we name politicians, scientists, artists and even military leaders. Even their activity was sometimes destructive. And what do you know about creation and humanity? Mother Teresa – one of the names associated with the mentioned qualities. She lived her life by heart focusing all her energy on simple but the most important issues in life: loving, helping, making. She named it as a call from God: To serve Him among the poorest of the poor. For more than 45 years she assisted poor, sick and orphaned throughout guiding Missionaries of Charity expansion. She got the Noble Prize and was beatified and given the title Blessed Teresa of Calcutta. She received praises from a lot of humanitarian organizations, governments and individuals and used them for promoting the principal idea of her life. However, she faced large amount of criticism. Mother Teresa kept strong social position against abortions and contraception, she believed in spiritual goodness of poverty. This line of life with God was seriously criticized by the groups and individuals who were standing for legalization of abortion. Moreover, the medical care in her concerns and hospices was discussed and widely criticized in medical journals. From 2010 we can conclude that this criticism was based on improper attitude to her popularity that she never used for herself. And in 2010, on the 100th anniversary of the birth of mother Teresa, she was honored all over the world for her invaluable investment to humanization. Life is a beauty, admire it. Life is a dream, realize it. Life is a wealth, keep it. Life is a promise, fulfill it. Life is a song, sing it. Life is so precious, do not destroy it. Life is life, fight for it! These are words of Mother Teresa and this is the way she dealt with her life. She did not mention one more issue: Life is a person next to you, help him. This is what she devoted her life to.

The Big Five Dimensions Of Traits - 1131 Words

1.What are the Big five dimensions of traits? Answer:The Big Five dimensions of traits are (1) surgency, (2) agreeableness, (3) adjustment, (4) conscientiousness, and (5) openness to experience. 2.What is the primary use of personality profiles? Answer:The personality profile. Specific stronger and weaker that will help you to match. Who is the best suit the strengths of their personality. 3.What are some of the traits that describe the high-energy trait? AnswerSome of the characteristics that describe the characteristics of high energy and drive the strength endurance of the stress, enthusiasm, patience, for frustration and attempt. 4.Is locus of control important to leaders? Why? Answer:Yes.Locus control is important because the†¦show more content†¦7.Does McClelland believe that power is good or bad? Why? Answer:McClelland doesn t believe the powers themselves.Whether it is good or bad, it is a method that is used is important to personal power is not good because it is applied to personal interests at the expense of others.Social power is a good thing, because it is used to help ourselves and others. 8.Should a leader have a dominant need for achievement to be successful? Why or why not? Answer:The leader In General ,it must be necessary for the success of the medium. People with a high need for achievement are more likely to seek the success of each and when they are not interested in leadership opportunities for personal power. 9.How do attitudes develop leadership styles? Answer:Our attitude toward self and others influence our leadership style into four catagories: (1) Theory Y attitudes with a positive self-concept, (2) Theory Y attitudes with a negative self-concept, (3) Theory X attitudes with a positive self-concept, and (4) Theory X attitudes with a negative self-concept. 10.Which personality traits are more closely related to ethical and unethical behavior? Answer:A group that has the personality traits sergeancy. There are two alternatives to using the powers for personal benefit or use of the powers Parties to power and has a conscience that has high achievement, some people will use the wrong unethical behavior.There are also people who lack

Frankenstein Compare And Contrast Essay - 2089 Words

Mary W. Shelley’s brilliant gothic story, Frankenstein, is one that emits the prevalent theme of light versus dark, in which possesses obvious characteristics of a novel written during the romantic era. The novel tells the account of the overambitious Victor Frankenstein, who created a monster in hopes that he’d be known for crafting something human from the body parts of corpses with physical and mental advantages in society, basically playing the part of God on Earth, but through the auspices of science. Instead of creating a â€Å"normal† human, his creation ended up being a disfigured creature who he then neglects. Upon his abandonment, the monster seeks revenge on Victor after being cast away by society due to harsh physiognomy in which†¦show more content†¦The monster believed that Victor would accept him, but after he realized that not only did Victor not want to assume his position in the monster’s life, but society also rejected him, it b ecame a transitory thought, and instead became replaced with his bloodthirst towards Victor and his loved ones, which he knew would hurt way worse than just killing him; making him lonely like himself. Both Victor and the monster partook in horrid acts, in which held horrendous actions; the main one being Victor creating the monster in the first place which in result caused the both of them heartbreak, loneliness, and pain. If Victor wouldn’t have created the monster, then his life would not be filled with so much grief and emptiness; Victor is the true monster, although they are both the primal protagonists as much as they are the antagonists because of the display of the emotions they both portray as lamenting humans/monsters, and the power they give to nature in order to destroy one another. Victor used nature to his advantage, although it was wrong; Victor used nature to create and destroy the monster; he used theShow MoreRelatedFrankenstein Compare/Contrast Essay922 Word s   |  4 PagesMaddie Mills October 19, 2010 CPBL, 5 Frank. Compare/Contrast Victor Frankenstein The novel Frankenstein was written by Mary Shelley in 1818. This gothic romance novel tells the story of a philosopher who discovered how to create life, without the full knowledge that his actions could cause grave consequences. Universal Studios made the film version of this novel in 1931. Unfortunately, the film version of Frankenstein has more differences than similarities to the novel. In the novel, Victor’sRead MoreWrite an Essay on the Relationship Between Frankenstein and the Creature, and Compare/Contrast Their Relationship with That Exhibited Between Two Other Characters in One Other Text.2328 Words   |  10 PagesThis essay will examine the relationship between two sets of characters in two different books. In Mary Shelleys’ Frankenstein the relationship between Victor Frankenstein and The Monster he created will be discussed, by analysing both characters relationship to each other before detailing the effects this relationship had, on the others actions and how it led to their eventual downfall. In Matthew Lewis’ The Monk the relationship between Ambrosio and Matilda will be analysed and then compared toRead MoreAnalysis Of Mary Shelley s Frankenstein And Caleb Williams 1168 Words   |  5 PagesIn A.D Harvey’s article â€Å"Frankenstein and Caleb Williams,† he explains that Mary Shelley’s famous work, Frankenstein; was not intended to be of any actual scientific evidence, but rather written just only with the intention of a gothic horror piece â€Å"we will each write a ghost story† (Frankenstein Author’s introduction vii). Harvey’s target is to reach out to the science community and to sway them to look past the mechanics of how Frankenstein’s monster is created and focus on other points of interestRead MoreThe Theme Of Fire And Ice In Frankenstein1243 Words   |  5 PagesIce is the antithesis to fire - while fire is life and change, ice is repression and death. The them e of fire and ice is commonly found in literature, often used to compare and contrast certain elements of written works. In the essay, â€Å"Fire and Ice in Frankenstein†, Andrew Griffin analyzes the components of Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein that contribute to the omnipresent theme of fire and ice in the text. Griffin provides many examples of the recurrent theme found in other works, such as Jane Eyre,Read MoreUnreliable Narrator1567 Words   |  7 Pagesneeds or justify their faults (Victor Frankenstein). In Frankenstein, Mary Shelley used unreliable narrators to tell the story, to make the readers question the truth told by different narrators and created a huge room of imagination to them. There are two narrator in Frankenstein were considered as unreliable, Robert Walton, an Arctic seafarer whose narrated his part with the letters for his sister in the beginning and the end of the story; Victor Frankenstein, a talented scientist created a monsterRead MoreSimilarities And Differences Between Frankenstein And Edward Scissorhands1247 Words   |  5 PagesFrankenstein and Edward Scissorhands Compare and Contrast Essay Frankenstein and Edward Scissorhand are both about two different creators creating their own kind of creatures, and the journey through the whole process and the life after creation. In both the novel and film we are able to compare different aspects of both the novel and film. Mary Shelley’s novel Frankenstein and Tim Burton’s film Edward Scissorhands have many similarities and differences starting from the desire of wanting to feelRead MoreCompare and contrast the Frankenstein novel and Coleridges rime of the ancient mariner in terms of narrative voice, theme and literary techniques1558 Words   |  7 PagesThe profound influence of Coleridges The Rime of the Ancyent Marinere is reflected in Shellys Frankenstein in terms of narrative structure, themes and literary techniques. This essay will compare and contrast the Frankenstein extract and the poem, The Rime of the Ancyent Marinere in three aspects, namely the narrating voice, the themes and the literary technique s used. In the Frankenstein passage, Victors creation, the creature, is the narrator. Here, a framed narrative is presentedRead MoreMary Shelleys Frankenstein Different Film Techniques Essay1849 Words   |  8 PagesMary Shelleys Frankenstein Different Film Techniques Compare and contrast the way in which the directors of Mary Shelleys Frankenstein (1994) and Frankenstein (1931) use different film techniques to build up atmosphere in their opening sequences: The two films I will be addressing in this essay are Kenneth Branaghs and James Whales versions of Frankenstein, a horror novel written by Mary Shelley in 1816, when the author was 19. The incentive for it wasRead MoreDogma Essay1688 Words   |  7 Pagesinspired us at an elemental level, to all this, has solid worth to offer in itself. In some cases, the conclusive resistance, a response to this accumulating decadence, to as stark of a contrast, works out in turn. As it stands, it’s not much of a strain on credulity to mull over how a text like Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, in its principled form, would’ve taken for being productive of its influences which precisely tie to its outer narrative makeup. The time and place is still the Romantic Age’s heightRead MoreComparing William Shelley s Frankenstein Essay1421 Words   |  6 Pages1010 099 October 3, 2016 Mrs. Miller Project 1: Compare/Contrast Blood Sucking Romeo With Halloween being right around the corner, children are preparing for ABC’s â€Å"Thirteen Nights of Halloween,† parents are picking up pumpkins to celebrate the Celtic holiday, and the urge for a good horror story is emerging. The monster, such as vampires or zombies, is taking the spotlight and it’s hard to ignore. From Dante’s Inferno to Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, being frightened has not only been one of people’s

Network Security Using Bluetooth Essay Sample free essay sample

Abstraction Bluetooth is a wireless protocol using short-range communications engineering easing informations transmittals over short distances from fixed and/or nomadic devices. making wireless PANs. Bluetooth provides a manner to link and interchange information between devices such as nomadic phones. telephones. laptops. personal computing machines. pressmans. GPS receiving systems. digital cameras. So the security of the Bluetooth becomes really of import. We have different types of security for Bluetooth to protect the information over the transmittal Here we discuss some of the Bluetooth security method. Authentication-A end of Bluetooth is the individuality confirmation of pass oning devices. This security service addresses the inquiry â€Å"Do I know with whom I’m pass oning? † This service provides an abort mechanism if a device can non authenticate decently Confidentiality-Confidentiality. or privateness. is another security end of Bluetooth. The purpose is to forestall information via media caused by listen ining ( inactive onslaught ) . This service. in general. We will write a custom essay sample on Network Security Using Bluetooth Essay Sample or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page addresses the inquiry â€Å"Are merely authorised devices allowed to see my informations? † Authorization-One another end of Bluetooth is a security service developed to let the control of resources. This service addresses the inquiry â€Å"Has this device been authorized to utilize this service? † GlossaryPAN – PERSONAL AREA NETWORKSLFSR – LINEAR FEEDBACK SHIFT REGISTERKG – KEY GENERATORFHSS – FREQUENCY-HOPPING SPREAD- SPECTRUML2CAP – LOGICAL LINK CONTROL AND ADAPTATION PROTOCOL Bluetooth Overview Ad hoc webs today are based chiefly on Bluetooth engineering. Bluetooth is an unfastened criterion for short-range digital wireless. It is touted as a low-priced. low-power. and low-profile engineering that provide a mechanism for making little radio webs on an ad hoc footing. Bluetooth is considered a radio PAN engineering that offers fast and dependable transmittal for both voice and informations. Untethered Bluetooth devices will extinguish the demand for overseas telegrams and supply a span to bing webs. Bluetooth can be used to link about any device to any other device. An illustration is the connexion between a PDA and a nomadic phone. The end of Bluetooth is to link disparate devices ( PDAs. cell phones. pressmans. facsimiles. etc. ) together wirelessly in a little environment such as an office or place. Harmonizing to the taking advocates of the engineering. Bluetooth is a criterion that will finally Extinguish wires and overseas telegrams between both stationary and nomadic devices †¢ Eliminate wires and overseas telegrams between both stationary and nomadic devices †¢ Facilitate both informations and voice communications †¢ Offer the possibility of ad hoc webs and present synchronism between personal devices. Bluetooth is designed to run in the unaccredited ISM ( industrial. scientific. medical applications ) band that is available in most parts of the universe. with fluctuation in some locations. Bluetooth-enabled devices will automatically turn up each other. but doing connexions with other devices and organizing webs requires user action. Frequency and Data Ratess The interior decorators of Bluetooth like those of the 802. 11 WLAN criterion designed Bluetooth to run in the unaccredited 2. 4 GHz–2. 4835 GHz ISM frequence set. Because legion other engineerings besides operate in this set. Bluetooth uses a frequency-hopping spread-spectrum ( FHSS ) engineering to work out intervention jobs. OPERATING RANGE OF BLUETOOTH The FHSS strategy uses 79 different wireless channels by altering frequence about 1. 600 times per second. One channel is used in 625 microseconds followed by a hop in a pseudo-random order to another channel for another 625 microsecond transmittal ; this procedure is repeated continuously. As stated antecedently. the ISM set has become popular for radio communications because it is available worldwide and does non necessitate a licence. In the ISM set. Bluetooth engineering permits transmittal velocities of up to 1 Mbps and achieves a throughput of about 720 kbps. Although the information rates are low compared to those of 802. 11 wireless LANs. it is still three to eight times the mean velocity of analogue and consecutive ports. severally. This rate is adequately fast for many of the applications for which Bluetooth was conceived. Furthermore. it is anticipated that even faster information rates will be available in the hereafter. Security of Bluetooth This subdivision helps the reader to understand the constitutional security characteristics of Bluetooth. It provides an overview of the built-in security characteristics to better exemplify its restrictions and supply a motive for some of the recommendations for enhanced security. Security for the Bluetooth wireless way is depicted in the undermentioned figure. [ pic ] As shown in the illustration. security for Bluetooth is provided on the assorted wireless links on the wireless paths merely. In other words. associate hallmark and encoding may be provided. but true end-to-end security is non possible without supplying higher layer security solutions on top of Bluetooth. In the illustration provided. security services are provided between the PDA and the pressman. between the cell phone and laptop. and between the laptop and the desktop. Briefly. the three basic security services defined by the Bluetooth specifications are the undermentioned: Security Features of Bluetooth per the Specifications Bluetooth has three different manners of security. Each Bluetooth device can run in one manner merely at a peculiar clip. The three manners are the undermentioned:†¢ Security Mode 1-Nonsecure manner†¢ Security Mode 2-Service-level implemented security manner †¢ Security Mode 3-Link-level implemented security manner [ movie ] BLUE TOOTH SECURITY MODES In Security Mode 1. a device will non originate any security processs. In this non-secure manner. the security functionality ( hallmark and encoding ) is wholly bypassed. In consequence. the Bluetooth device in Mode 1 is in a â€Å"promiscuous† manner that allows other Bluetooth devices to link to it. This manner is provided for applications for which security is non required. such as interchanging concern cards. In Security Mode 2. the service-level security manner. security processs are initiated after channel constitution at the Logical Link Control and Adaptation Protocol ( L2CAP ) degree. L2CAP resides in the informations link bed and provides connection-oriented and connectionless informations services to upper beds. For this security manner. a security director ( as specified in the Bluetooth architecture ) controls entree to services and to devices. The centralised security director maintains constabularies for entree control and interfaces with other protocols and device users. Changing security constabularies and â€Å"trust† degrees to curtail entree may be defined for applications with different security demands runing in analogue. It is possible to allow entree to some services without supplying entree to other services. Obviously. in this manner. the impression of authorization-that is the procedure of make up ones minding if device A is allowed to hold entree to serve X-is introduced. In Security Mode 3. the link-level security manner. a Bluetooth device novices security processs before the channel is established. This is a constitutional security mechanism. and it is non cognizant of any application bed security that may be. This manner supports hallmark ( unidirectional or common ) and encoding. These characteristics are based on a secret nexus key that is shared by a brace of devices. To bring forth this key. a pairing process is used when the two devices communicate for the first clip. Link Key Generation—Bluetooth Bonding The nexus key is generated during an low-level formatting stage. while two Bluetooth devices that are pass oning are â€Å"associated† or â€Å"bonded. † Per the Bluetooth specification. two associated devices at the same time derive nexus keys during the low-level formatting stage when a user enters an indistinguishable PIN into both devices. 1. Combination – pairwise key2. Unit – unit – specific key3. Initialization – used during low-level formatting merely4. Maestro – used for broadcast The PIN entry. device association. and cardinal derivation are depicted conceptually. After low-level formatting is complete. devices automatically and transparently authenticate and perform encoding of the nexus. It is possible to make a nexus key utilizing higher bed cardinal exchange methods and so import the nexus key into the Bluetooth faculties. The PIN codification used in Bluetooth devices can change between 1 and 16 bytes. The typical 4-digit PIN may be sufficient for some applications ; nevertheless. longer codifications may be necessary. Authentication The Bluetooth hallmark process is in the signifier of a â€Å"challenge-response† strategy. Two devices Interacting in an hallmark process is referred to as the claimant and the voucher. The voucher is the Bluetooth device formalizing the individuality of another device. The claimant is the device trying to turn out its individuality. The challenge-response protocol validates devices by verifying the cognition of a secret key-a Bluetooth nexus key. The challenge-response confirmation strategy is depicted conceptually is given in figure. As shown. one of the Bluetooth devices ( the claimant ) attempts to make and link to the other ( the voucher ) . The stairss in the hallmark procedure are the undermentioned: Measure 1: The claimant transmits its 48-bit reference ( BD_ADDR ) to the voucher. Measure 2: The voucher transmits a 128-bit random challenge ( AU_RAND ) to the claimant. Algorithm to calculate an hallmark response utilizing the Measure 3: The voucher uses the E1 reference. nexus key. and random challenge as inputs. The claimant performs the same calculation. Measure 4: The claimant returns the computed response. SRES. to the voucher. Measure 5: The voucher compares the SRES from the claimant with the SRES that it computes. Step 6: If the two 32-bit SRES values are equal. the voucher will go on connexion constitution. [ pic ] If hallmark fails. a Bluetooth device will wait an interval of clip before a new effort can be made. This clip interval will increase exponentially to forestall an antagonist from repeated efforts to derive entree by get the better ofing the hallmark strategy through trial-and-error with different keys. However. it is of import to observe that this â€Å"suspend† technique does non supply security against sophisticated antagonists executing offline onslaughts to thoroughly seek PINs. Again. the Bluetooth criterion allows both uni- directional and common hallmark to be performed. The hallmark map used for the proof is based on the SAFER+ algorithm. E1 the Bluetooth reference is a public parametric quantity that is alone to each device. This reference can be obtained through a device enquiry procedure. The private key. or associate cardinal. is a secret entity. The nexus key is derived during low-level formatting. is neer disclosed outside the Bluetooth device. and is neer transmitted over the air-interface. The random challenge. evidently a public parametric quantity. is designed to be different on every dealing. The random figure is derived from a pseudo-random procedure within the Bluetooth device. The cryptanalytic response is public every bit good. With cognition of the challenge and response parametric quantities. it should be impossible to foretell the following challenge or deduce the nexus key. | | |SECRECY CHARACTERISTIC | |PARAMETER |LENGTH | | |Device Address |48 bits |Public | | | |Public. Unpredictable | |Random challenge |128 bits | | |Authentication response | | | | |32 bits |Public | |Link cardinal |128 spots |Secret | AUTHENTICATION PARAMETER TABLE Confidentiality In add-on to the hallmark strategy. Bluetooth provides for a confidentiality security service to queer listen ining efforts on the air-interface. Bluetooth encoding is provided to protect the warheads of the packages exchanged between two Bluetooth devices. The encoding strategy for this service is depicted conceptually in Figure. As shown in Figure the Bluetooth encoding process is based on a watercourse cypher. E0 end product is exclusive-OR-ed with the warhead spots and sent to the receiving device. This cardinal watercourse is produced utilizing a cryptanalytic algorithm based on additive feedback displacement registries ( LFSR ) . The encrypt map takes as inputs the maestro individuality ( BD_ADDR ) . the random figure ( EN_RAND ) . a slot figure. and an encoding key. which initialize the LFSRs before the transmittal of each package. if encoding is enabled. Since the slot figure used in the watercourse cypher alterations with each package. the coding engine is besides reinitialized with each package although the other variables remain inactive. In below figure the encoding key provided to the encoding algorithm is produced utilizing an internal key generator ( KG ) . This cardinal generator produces watercourse cypher keys based on the nexus key. random figure ( EN_RAND once more ) . and the ACO value. The ACO parametric quantity. a 96-bit attested cypher beginning. is another end product produced during the hallmark process shown in Bluetooth hallmark figure. As mentioned above. the nexus key is the 128-bit secret key that is held in the Bluetooth devices and is non accessible to the user. Furthermore. this critical security component is neer transmitted outside the Bluetooth device. The encoding key ( KC ) is generated from the current nexus key. The cardinal size may change from 8 spots to 128 spots and is negotiated. The dialogue procedure occurs between maestro devices and slave devices. During dialogue. a maestro device makes a cardinal size suggestion for the slave. In every application. a â€Å"minimum acceptable† cardinal size parametric quantity can be set to forestall a malicious user from driving the key size down to the lower limit of 8 spots. doing the nexus wholly insecure. The Bluetooth specification besides allows three different encoding manners to back up the confidentiality service: †¢ Encryption Mode 1-No encoding is performed on any traffic. †¢ Encryption Mode 2-Broadcast traffic goes unprotected ( non encrypted ) . but separately addressed traffic is encrypted harmonizing to the single nexus keys. †¢ Encryption Mode 3-All traffic is encrypted harmonizing to the maestro nexus key. Mandate In add-on to the three security manners. Bluetooth allows two degrees of trust and three degrees of service security. The two degrees of trust are â€Å"trusted† and â€Å"un-trusted. † Trusted devices are 1s that have a fixed relationship and hence have full entree to all services. Un-trusted devices do non keep a lasting relationship ; this consequences in a restricted service entree. For services. three degrees of security have been defined. These degrees are provided so that the demands for mandate. hallmark. and encoding can be set independently. The security degrees can be described as follows: Service Level 1- Those that requires mandate and hallmark. Automatic entree is granted merely to trusted devices. Un-trusted devices need manual mandate. Service Level 2- Those that require hallmark merely. Access to an application is allowed merely after an hallmark process. Authorization is non necessary. Service Level 3- Those that are unfastened to all devices. Authentication is non required. and entree is granted automatically. Associated with these degrees are the undermentioned security controls to curtail entree to services: mandate required ( this ever includes hallmark ) . hallmark required. and encoding required ( associate must be encrypted before the application can be accessed ) . The Bluetooth architecture allows for specifying security policies that can put trust relationships in such a manner that even trusted devices can acquire entree merely to specific services and non to others. It is of import to understand that Bluetooth nucleus protocols can authenticate lone devices and non users. This is non to state that user-based entree control is non possible. The Bluetooth security architecture ( through the security director ) allows applications to implement their ain security policies. The nexus bed. at which Bluetooth specific security controls operate. is crystalline to the security controls imposed by the application beds. Thus it is possible to implement user-based hallmark and powdered entree control within the Bluetooth security model. Decision Bluetooth offers several benefits and advantages. Specifically. Bluetooth need to turn to security concerns for confidentiality. informations unity. and web handiness. Furthermore. since Bluetooth devices are more likely to be managed by agencies of the above security manners. Mentions: Cryptanalysis: Theory and pattern by D. Stinsown Internet security protocols by Uyless black Network security by Ankit Fadia Cryptography and watermarking-Attack and counter steps by Neil. F. Johnson Web sites: World Wide Web. ifsac. com World Wide Web. cryptanalysis. com World Wide Web. networksecurity. com hypertext transfer protocol: //www. research. att. com/